Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Protests force rethink on flight paths



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
05 August 2008

But it could mean more aircraft noise for other areas

The company in control of flight paths around Luton Airport is going back to the drawing board following overwhelming public opposition to proposals it published earlier this year.

National Air Traffic Services has just published the feedback it received during the consultation on its proposals to change flight paths out of the airport.

The results show 86 per cent of people who responded were opposed to the proposals, which would have seen more than 5,000 extra people affected by aircraft noise.

During the consultation on the Luton proposals, NATS received nearly 5,000 individual written responses, 2,700 online responses, and nearly 7,000 signatures on petitions.

The majority of grievances were over the loss of tranquility in rural areas, and many also raised concerns about the consultation process itself.

NATS is now looking at a range of further options for the flight paths for westerly departures affecting the villages of Caddington, Slip End, Edlesborough and Eaton Bray.

For the Caddington and Slip End area it says it is looking at a way to 'more closely replicate the alignment of, and spread of traffic around, the initial turn of the departure route in operation today'.

However, a re-think on the affected area further west might not be such welcome news, as NATS says new options could include over-flying Edlesborough, Whipsnade, Totternhoe and Dunstable.

These routes would be more fuel efficient but could have an impact on airspace used by gliders.

To view the feedback document visit the NATS website by clicking here.

The full article contains 271 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 August 2008 9:49 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Luton
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should worldwide tours of the Olympic flame be abandoned to stop giving protestors an easy target
Yes, it's a pointless stunt anyway and would not be missed
No, you can't give in to bully tactics from any quarter
Bring on more protests, they are more entertaining than the sport

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.