Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Luton show the way forward

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 February 2010
How the Hatters rated


Mark Tyler: 7 – Showed no ill effect from the back problem that has kept him out. One good save to deny Jason Walker but virtually untroubled.

George Pilkington: 7.5 – Much more like his normal self. Gelled well with Kovacs and gave little away.

Janos Kovacs: 7 – Dominant in the air at the back, despite being up against a good froward in the form of Nick Chadwick.

Keith Keane: 7.5 – Reads the game so well and made a number of important interventions. Long throw could become a real weapon.

Freddie Murray: 7 – Struggled to get forward but stuck to his task manfully as part of a solid-looking back four.

Kevin Nicholls: 7 – Not as mobile as he once was, but always looked for the forward pass and delivered some great set-pieces, including the corner for the goal.

Asa Hall: 7.5 – Lively from the very start. Not afraid to put his foot in or have a pop at goal – even if his shooting was a little wayward.

Adam Newton: 7 – Not at his rampaging best, but far more keyed in and played a full part in a real team performance.

Claude Gnakpa: 7.5 – Real pace, lots of skill and great in the air. Gave the Bluebirds a torrid time on the right, but could still do better defensively.

Tom Craddock: 8 – Chased everything and was a constant menace, just need to rediscover that Midas touch in front of goal.

Liam Hatch: 8 – Showed again just what the Hatters have been missing all season. Great goal, almost had a second, and was real thorn in Barrow's side.

Mark Nwokeji (sub): 7 – Gave Luton some renewed impetus and Barrow yet another headache at the back.

Rossi Jarvis (sub): 6.5 – Linked well after his introduction but not enough time to make a real impact.

Craig Nelthorpe (sub): 6.5 – Put in a great cross after his introduction and looked keen and direct.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 February 2010 9:22 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Luton
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.